Dear Mr Murphy,
        I have received your letter dated June 12th 2002,
        and I find myself extremely surprised by it.
        According to my records, a person from Galway
        County Council - who to the best of my recollection told me his name was Enda
        Coey (or something similar), suddenly appeared at my brother's petrol station on Wednesday
        May 1st last to inform us there was a "problem" with a sign I had
        put up some weeks earlier on an existing wall (erected around 1935) which forms part
        of our family business premises here in the village of New Inn.
        When asked what our options were regarding this
        "problem" with the sign, Mr Coey (assuming I have his name right) informed
        me - in the presence of my brother - that one of
        three options available to us was to apply for planning permission for it. 
        On hearing this I immediately, and without any hesitation, informed him that this is what
        I would like to do.  As I recall it, I then proceeded to ask him how I
        could get the necessary forms to fill in, and he told me he did not have them with
        him at the time: but, that he would send them to me through the post the following day.
        I would now ask you to note very carefully that, to
        date, I have not received the forms Mr Coey told me he would send to me (on May 1st 2002)
        for the purpose of applying for planning permission for the "problem" sign: and
        neither has my brother (according to what he has told me this morning).  
Instead,
        and without any warning of any kind, I suddenly received your letter
        yesterday demanding that the sign be removed immediately.
        Although I am not a lawyer, I do know that in some
        countries at least, capricious behaviour of the kind I have attempted to outline above can
        in certain circumstances be deemed unlawful: particularly if it is found that the main
        purpose of such behaviour might be to bully, and/or to intimidate and provoke.
        When (on May 1st last), the matter of the
        "problem" sign was fully settled (for the time being on that particular day), I
        then asked Mr Coey - while he was in the area - if he could have a look at one of the
        illegal sewerage discharges going into the river which I have written to Galway County
        Council about on several occasions during the past few years. To my utter surprise
        and amazement, he very clearly indicated that he would be completely unwilling to
        do so under any circumstances. 
        According to the records I have in front of me just now, my
        last attempt at trying to get help from Galway County Council regarding the ongoing set of illegal sewage problems in New Inn was
        on April 10th 2001 - in a letter sent through the registered post
        addressed to: Mr Liam Gavin, Senior Executive Engineer, (Environment Section),
        Galway County Council, County Hall, Prospect Hill, Galway City.  The Post
        Office reference number for the registered letter in question is: 
        RR 2248 8476 5 IE.
        On the day following Mr Coey's visit (that is May 2nd
        2002), and for reasons that are still something of a huge mystery to me, I happened by
        chance to notice that two policemen were interviewing my brother inside his business
        premises.  A short while later, the policemen involved then invited me to give
        them a statement regarding Mr Coey's visit of the previous day; and, when one of
        them explained to me that I did not have to give them such a statement, I declined to
        say anything to them about the matter - which they both seemed to readily accept
        without any difficulty.  Shortly after the police had left, my brother told me
        that he had signed a statement which one of the policemen wrote out during his interview
        with them.  Although I did not see this statement, and knowing my brother as I do, I
        have no reason to believe that my brother's account to the police of what happened the day
        before during Mr Coey's visit would be anything other than accurate (to the very best of
        his ability).
        With further reference to the police interview with my
        brother referred to in the paragraph above, I feel I should point out to you now that my
        brother, Mr Gerald Finnerty, and my half-sister Ms Marjorie Dolan (who often looks after
        our family business premises on her own), are both under the care of Western
        Health Board psychiatrist Dr. Anne Jeffers. Through no fault of their own,
        they have been subjected in the past to bouts of extreme psychological pressure
        (which occurred over a period of some 15 years or more possibly): which were directly
        connected with parental alcoholism.  To
        make matters far worse (in my view), and despite my very best efforts to have the
        situation corrected (which includes written communications with the Minister for
        Health Mr Michael Martin T.D.), neither my brother nor my half-sister have EVER
        received any psychiatric treatment (that I know of) which is specifically
        designed to help the victims of parental alcoholism. Instead, they continue to be
        treated (as far as I know) for "endogenous" depression - a term which I
        understand refers to forms of depression that originate within the brain for no know
        cause: which, in the case of my brother and half-sister constitutes a medical diagnosis
        that is totally false (as far as I am concerned).  I make this last statement as
        a person who has been receiving treatment on a continuous basis since 1975 for the
        psychological damage caused by parental alcoholism - treatment of the correct kind
        (as I see it), which does not involve the use of prescribed brain drugs of any
        kind - except for short periods in the early stages of treatment perhaps; when, as I know
        from my own direct experience, medical doctors may have to deal with extreme
        difficulties: such as their patient's suicidal thoughts and inclinations for
        instance. One very difficult family consequence of our present situation is that
        my brother and half-sister have now been on anti-depressant brain drugs for a continuous
        period of many years (40 years non-stop in the case of my half-sister). 
        I feel I should also inform you now that detailed research I have carried out
        privately during the past few years has left me in little doubt that it is in breach
        of Tort law in this country for psychiatrists to be knowingly giving
        wrong treatment of the kind which would make no sense to the general mass of the
        "non-medical" population of the Republic of Ireland: regardless of how
        successfully such psychiatrists might rationalise their own irresponsible
        behaviour (as I see it) amongst themselves.  I wish to also point out
        that when I eventually decided to try and have this ongoing family problem
        challenged in court here in the Republic of Ireland, I failed (completely) to find a
        lawyer willing to help me with the necessary work that doing so would
        involve. My efforts at finding a lawyer for this purpose included the sending of
        two registered letters addressed to: Mr Kenneth Murphy, Director
        General, The Law Society of Ireland, Blackhall Place, Dublin 7.  According
        to my records, the second of these two letters was posted on June 27th 2000. 
        To date, I have received no reply of any kind from Mr Kenneth Murphy (or from anybody
        connected with the Law Society of Ireland) to either of the two letters in question that I
        sent directly to him.
        Before (and in case) Galway County
        Council suddenly decide to send any more people out to our family business premises here
        in New Inn, I would be very grateful if all of those involved could keep the
        contents of the paragraph immediately above in mind please. 
        The "problem" sign you refer to in your letter to
        me of June 12th 2002 contains the address of an Internet location (www.finnachta.com), and nothing else.  I reserved
        this name about a year ago with the intention of using it TO EARN A LIVING at
        some later date.  Given the opportunity, I would have reserved the name www.finnerty.com for our family
        business; but, when I tried to reserve that particular name I found that it had already
        been taken by somebody unknown to me who (as far as I can recall) lives somewhere in the
        United States.  In the circumstances, I then tried for the Celtic version of my
        family name (which is "Finnachta"), and found that was
        available.
        While I fully accept that I might (unknown to myself)
        have accidentally done something wrong by putting up the www.finnachta.com sign outside our family
        business premises, it is not at all clear to me at the present time why that
        would be?   Please note that when Mr Coey called here on May 1st last he did not
        give any reason at all as to why the www.finnachta.com sign was a "problem"
        (as he referred to it) for Galway County Council.  Far more importantly (from my
        present viewpoint today), is the fact that your letter to me dated June 12th 2002 also
        gives no indication whatsoever as to why this commercial sign (located as it is
        outside a business premises which was established some 67 years ago) is such a
        "problem" for Galway County Council that it gets total and
        complete priority over the illegal sewage discharges that are entering the river
        (upstream from the local community water supply pumping system) just a mere 100 yards or
        so away from the sign itself ??? 
        Further details (including photographs) of the above
        mentioned sewage problems in the middle of New Inn village can be seen at the following
        www page address:
        
http://homepage.eircom.net/~williamfinnerty/environment.htm
        Also, a photograph of the www.finnachta.com "problem" sign
        appears at the following www page address:
        
http://www.finnachta.com/Election/May_2002_General_Election.htm
        The "General Election" www page address
        immediately above also contains the following paragraph (for the purpose of
        attempting to explain why the "problem" sign was put up at the particular time
        that I put it in place):  "In an effort to try and get
        around what we see as corrupt media censorship of our efforts in the run-up to the
        election, a roadside sign has very recently been placed in the middle of New Inn
        village which enables members of the public to find the information on this page:
        regardless of traditional media outlets, and their ongoing efforts to keep this
        information hidden from voters."
        Later today, I intend to send a printed (and signed) copy of this e-mail to you
        through the registered post addressed as follows:
        Mr Tony Murphy (County Secretary)
        Box No. 27
        Galway County Council
        Planning & Development Section
        Arus an Chontae
        Prospect Hill
        Galway.
        Finally, I would like to STRESS that I remain entirely happy to
        apply for planning permission for the "problem" sign; and, assuming you feel it
        is still appropriate, I would be very grateful if you could arrange for the necessary
        application forms to be sent to me through the post please.
        Yours sincerely,
         
        Mr William Finnerty
        "St Albans"
        New Inn
        Ballinasloe
        County Galway.