Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 1:13 PM
            
              
              Subject: NEW summons to appear at Loughrea District Court 
              on Wednesday October 9th 2002.
 
           
          
            
            
            
          
          
            European Parliament reference: 
            Petition 809/2001.  
            Re:  Summons 
            delivered by hand yesterday for me to appear at Loughrea District 
            Court on Wednesday October 9th 2002 - this time to answer a 
            NEW charge that I "assaulted 
            Enda Hoey" of
            Galway County Council on May 1st 2002. 
            
            
          
          
          
             
          
            Dear Mr Gemelli,
          
             
          
            SECTION A:
            My affairs have now reached a stage where I feel I have to 
            point out that the processing time for Petition 809/2001 
            appears to be taking far too long. To the best of my knowledge, 
            nothing of any significance has been done (to date) regarding
            ANY of the issues I have raised. This has already 
            produced a number of troublesome consequences for me, and I would 
            ask you PLEASE to take careful note of the fact 
            that the difficulties I am experiencing regarding these matters are 
            actually growing in number, and in strength: instead of getting less 
            - as I had hoped would happen when I first made my petition for help 
            to the European Parliament. 
          
             
          
            With reference to the "Right to 
            good administration" undertaking, which I assume you will 
            already know about, Item 1 under Article 41 
            of the CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 
            clearly states: 
            "Every person has the right to have his or her affairs 
            handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time by 
            the institutions and bodies of the Union."  
           
          
             
          
            Before leaving this section, I wish to 
            stress (again) that the phrase "within 
            a reasonable time" in the above paragraph has now 
            become a MAJOR issue for me.
          
            _____________________________
          
            
            
               
            
              SECTION 
              B:
              Of the problems 
              I have struggled with during the course of the past four years or 
              so, the ones which I feel threaten my personal interests most (in 
              order of priority) are listed below using the numbers "ONE" 
              to "FOUR": 
           
          
             
          
            
            ONE: 
            The ongoing difficulties in my family regarding the fact that my
            brother and half-sister have NEVER 
            (to date) received ANY medical treatment which specifically 
            addresses the psychological damage caused by parental alcoholism:
            which, my research suggests, is in breach of Tort Law (in 
            the Republic of Ireland).  Some of the core aspects of this 
            problem have already been outlined in paragraph 9 
            of my e-mail letter dated June 14th 2002 to Galway 
            County Council which can now be seen at www page address: 
          
          
             
          
            The overall aspects of this particular family 
            problem were set out in a six-page letter sent through the 
            registered post on July 27th 2000 to the 
            Minister for Health (Mr. Micheal Martin). Copies of the 
            July 27th 2000 letter to Minister Martin were sent (by registered 
            post) to Dr. Anne Jeffers (Consultant Psychiatrist, 
            Western Health Board), to Dr. Sheila Ryan (Chief 
            Executive of the Western Health Board), and to Mr. Kenneth 
            Murphy (Director General of The Law Society of Ireland).
          
             
          
            When the above mentioned set of letters 
            sent on July 27th 2000 failed to produce any useful results, I then 
            sent a copy of the July 27th 2000 letter (with a covering note) to
            Prime Minister Ahern on August 24th 2000; 
            and, when that in turn failed to do any good, I wrote in similar 
            fashion to President Mary McAleese on 
            September 14th 2000. (Both of these letters were also sent 
            through the registered post.)
          
             
          
            
            TWO: 
            The ongoing problems in my locality relating to 
            "Waste Management (Amendment) Act 2001" (Republic of 
            Ireland). I very strongly suspect this law is unconstitutional: and 
            consequently NOT WORTH THE PAPER IT IS 
            WRITTEN ON. If this is the case, then it must surely 
            be one of the very worst indicators imaginable - as 
            far as the "good administration" undertaking is 
            concerned? 
          
             
          
            As has been reported many 
            times here, Central Government now have very strong plans to 
            forcefully impose (in bully-like fashion) a 
            huge superdump in one of three selected areas in 
            East Galway through the heavy-handed use of "Waste 
            Management (Amendment) Act 2001": in 
            spite of the fact that the vast majority (possibly all) of the 
            locally elected politicians have repeatedly voted against the 
            locating of such a dump at ANY of the three particular sites in 
            question.  It appears that 
            Central Government cannot (or will not) accept a 
            very simple democratically voiced "NO" of the kind 
            that is FULLY in keeping with Article 28A 
            of our written Constitution.  
          
          
             
          
            Some of the other core problems 
            connected with "Waste Management (Amendment) Act 2001" have already 
            been related in section (5) of my e-mail letter 
            dated August 17th 2002 to the Director of 
            Public Prosecutions (Mr. James Hamilton).  They can now be 
            viewed in section 5 of the main e-mail text at the following www 
            page location:
            
            
            http://homepage.eircom.net/~williamfinnerty/DPP_EU_problems_1_.htm#(5)  
          
          
            As you will already know, I note that 
            "Waste Management (Amendment) Act 2001" has been mentioned in a 
            completely separate petition to you made by another 
            East Galway local resident (Mr. Brendan Kelly) on
            February 1st 2002.  I further note that 
            paragraph 12 (half-way down page 2) of the 
            petition in question (EU reference: Petition 235/2002) contains 
            an "urgent" request to 
            the European Parliament to have the validity of 
            this law checked.  The text of Petition 235/2002 can now be viewed 
            at www page location:
          
          
             
          
            
            THREE: The several health threats posed by the 
            ongoing illegal sewage discharges into the river in 
            the middle of the village right beside my present home. The main 
            problems are set out at www page address: 
          
          
             
          
            I would like to take this opportunity to 
            point out that the changes made in April 2001 to 
            the visibility of the unlawful sewage discharges in question were 
            made by Galway County Council under the supervision 
            of a person who told me his name was Noel Casey. The 
            cosmetic changes in question mean that the untreated sewage 
            discharges indicated on photographs 3 
            and 4 at the www page address immediately above now 
            enter the main flow of the river about 50 yards CLOSER 
            to the pumps used to supply the local community drinking water 
            supply than they did previous to April 2001.  
            Far more importantly (as I see it), these 
            cosmetic changes powerfully demonstrate the arrogance of Galway 
            County Council's presumption that they are somehow (?) above the 
            law.
          
             
          
            Also relevant to this illegal sewage 
            problem, are the contents of an article which appeared on 
            Page 10 of The Irish Times Newspaper dated
            August 15th 2002: on the subject of 
            CRYPTOSPORIDIUM (a water-borne pathogen).  Among several 
            things mentioned in the article are the following:  (1) 
            "It is often fatal for those with 
            reduced immunity and causes misery for healthy individuals who 
            contact it.";  (2) "Water 
            chlorination doesn't take this organism out";  (3) 
            "Animal or human waste is the usual 
            source of an outbreak, which spreads easily in water supplies." 
          
             
          
            Further information on the 
            cryptosporidium subject can be found at www page address:
          
          
             
          
            
            FOUR: The ongoing neglect of important local 
            heritage sites.  Last 
            April I was contacted (through the Internet) by an American 
            businessman who was VERY interested in organising a project to 
            restore the centuries old set of local buildings known as 
            Woodlawn House.  As a member of a group I belong to named
            FOWHG (Friends
            Of 
            Woodlawn 
            House 
            Group), I later attended a 
            number of business meetings where it was estimated that 80 or so 
            people would be employed for a period of approximately three years 
            to restore these buildings into a good quality hotel - which would 
            have sports and conference facilities etcetera on the 115 acre 
            site.  It was further estimated that when the project was completed, 
            the hotel in question would provide full-time employment for around 
            50 local people. Though the American person in question appears to 
            have found people from different countries willing to invest six 
            figure sums in the project, a number of MAJOR 
            problems have arisen because of a superdump that a 
            private company called Celtic Waste are planning to 
            locate within a mile or so of Woodlawn House: 
            apparently with the full approval of both 
            Local and Central Government. Further information 
            regarding Woodlawn House can be found at www page address:
            
            http://www.finnachta.com/FOWHG_Contact_Form_.htm 
          
             
          
          
             
          
            Please note also that Local and 
            Central Government have ONGOING plans to put 
            a major new road right through the middle of what may be the 
            remnants of the largest Celtic site in 
            the Republic of Ireland around the time of Christ:
            presumably (?) for the purpose of making it easy for rubbish 
            trucks to access the superdump they plan to locate close to 
            the Turoe Stone at the centre of the vast "Oppidum".  
            Further information regarding this matter can be found in the text 
            sent to me by research scientist Dr. Kieran Jordan 
            in March 2001 - which is at www page address:
          
          
             
          
            As far as I know, and although I have 
            done all I reasonably could to inform the appropriate people, there 
            has NOT been any significant attempt (to date) made 
            by archaeologists to investigate the information Dr. Jordan set out 
            in the notes he sent me.  For additional information on this and 
            other local heritage matters, please see the following www page 
            address:
          
          
             
          
            _____________________________
          
            
               
            
              SECTION C:
              As I believe you will also know already, Item 3 
              under Article 41 of the CHARTER OF 
              FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION states that:
              "Every person has the right to have 
              the Community make good any damage caused by its institutions or 
              by its servants in the performance of its duties, in accordance 
              with the general principles common to the laws of Member States." 
           
          
             
          
            As it is the case that I feel I have 
            suffered MUCH damage as a result of Community 
            institutions and servants failing in the performance of their 
            duties, I now wish to have these damages made good: in so far as it 
            is possible to do so - having due regard for all the time I have 
            already lost: which of course NOBODY can ever give back
            to me, or substitute for. Consequently, I would be 
            grateful if you could now provide me with the basic practical 
            information I need to set about implementing the Article 41 
            principle to "make good" the damage I have been caused relating 
            to my losses in connection with all matters referred to in this 
            e-mail.
          
             
          
            I hope to be in receipt of all the basic 
            information requested from you in this section of this e-mail within 
            the coming 14 days please.
          
             
          
            
            
              I now feel it necessary to point out that I never received any of 
              the "acknowledgements of receipt" I requested for the three 
              letters I posted to EU addresses on March 
              25th 2002 (to Strasbourg, 
              Luxembourg, and Brussels).  Scanned 
              copies of the Post Office receipts can be seen at the following 
              www page address:
            
            
               
            
           
          
            
            
              Allowing for the fact that I was very suddenly charged yesterday 
              with some new (and possibly more serious offence), 
              I now feel I need to have the following two questions answered by 
              you (in writing) please: (a) Did 
              the three letters referred to in the paragraph immediately above 
              ever reach their intended destinations?; and,
              (b) on what dates were they received (assuming of 
              course that they were received)?
            
               
            
           
          
            Please note that I will not be making 
            any FINAL decision as to whether (or not) I will be 
            attending Loughrea District Court on October 9th 2002 until I have 
            received a written reply from you regarding the information I seek 
            in this section of this e-mail. This is largely because I do 
            not believe the District Court in Loughrea (or anywhere else) is the 
            appropriate place to be hearing my case. 
          
             
          
            My case concerns VERY serious matters 
            which includes such things as "neglect of duty" and 
            "dereliction of duty" (by senior medical officers, 
            politicians, and lawyers), and State corruption: if 
            - as I suspect to be the case - "Waste Management (Amendment) Act 
            2001" is unconstitutional, and the product of collusion involving 
            senior State lawyers and politicians who have known perfectly well 
            all along that this law is in breach of Article 28A of our written 
            Constitution.  These are all matters which I believe should be dealt 
            with by the highest Court in the State: not the lowest; and, if Mr. 
            Hamilton (The Director of Public Prosecutions here in the Republic 
            of Ireland) is not willing to take those concerned to task in one or 
            other of the higher courts here, then I believe ALL PARTS 
            of my case should be heard by the European Court of Justice. The 
            DPP's attempt to get me into a District Court on 
            October 9th 2002 regarding the TINY part which 
            relates to Mr. Hoey is (I suspect) a form of corrupt trickery.
          
             
          
            I have been told (by a number of 
            different people) that it is widely believed and accepted by 
            all concerned that attempts to get to the real truth of 
            matters is a very rough-and-ready business at 
            District Court level; and, that a considerable amount of 
            LYING is both expected,
            and acceptable, in such places. While such 
            rough-and-ready arrangements regarding the truth would not suit me 
            at all, I can easily see they would provide a huge advantage to the 
            DPP and his colleagues in securing a criminal conviction 
            against me: all be it a CORRUPT one - 
            from which, nevertheless, it might be 
            impossible for me (in practical terms) to EVER free myself of the 
            stigma.
          
             
          
            When the local policeman (Garda 
            Thomas Kenny) delivered the new summons to me yesterday 
            afternoon by hand, I understand (from what he then told me) that the 
            original charge of "threatening to assault" (which 
            was due to be heard on September 11th 2002) has now been dropped: 
            and replaced with the possibly more serious one now scheduled to be 
            heard on Wednesday October 9th 2002.
          
             
          
            Finally, as far as this section is 
            concerned, I feel I should point out that I have NOT 
            received the photocopy of the papers my brother 
            signed: which I requested from Mr Hamilton (DPP) in Section 
            9 my e-mail letter to him dated August 17th 2002.  I cannot 
            help speculating (perhaps wrongly) that the failure to give me this 
            important information is linked with the decision to seriously ALTER 
            (without explanation) the charge I am being accused 
            of. The text of my request to the DPP can be seen at the following 
            www location:
          
          
            _____________________________
          
             
          
          
            
              SECTION D:
              Later today I intend to send you a printed (and signed) 
              copy of this e-mail through the registered post.  Also, and partly 
              for the purpose of providing a translation service into other 
              European languages, I plan to place the text of this e-mail onto 
              the Internet at the following www address sometime during this 
              present weekend: 
           
          
          
             
          
          
             
          
            Sincerely,
          
             
          
             
          
            Mr William Finnerty.
          
             
          
          
            Postal Address: "St 
            Albans", New Inn, Ballinasloe, County Galway, Republic of Ireland.