=====================================
No injunctions -
why?
by W.
Finnerty. Wed Oct 25, 2006
18:15 Allowing for the way
Minister for
Justice McDowell TD is being publicly accused (in writing) of corruption,
why is it that he not issuing any injunctions - as would normally be the case if
the accusations were false?
This point has been raised in an e-mail
sent earlier today to a number of people, including
17 MEPs (Members of
the European Parliament).
As some will already know, one of the 17
MEPs included in the above mentioned "Group of 17",
Mr Ashley Mote, has
been asking some VERY awkward questions about rampant, totally out-of-control
corruption in the European Union: which is thought to involve the so called
"
Illuminati's global slush fund", allegedly managed from
Brussels,
and according to one report estimated to be in the region of "
65 Trillion
Dollars" (please see
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/23-Mar-2006.html ).
So far, Mr
Mote does not appear to be getting any useful answers to the questions he and
his highly experienced associate, "forensic accountant"
Mr Christopher Story
FRSA of "
International Currency Review", have been
seeking.
For
future reference purposes, full
details of today's e-mail to 17 MEPs can be viewed at the following
address:
http://www.europeancourtofhumanrightswilliamfinnerty.com/Politicians/MEPs25October2006/Email.htm How
many "
plain brown envelopes" would it take to hold "65 Trillion Dollars"
(in used notes) I wonder?
Related Link: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Ashley+Mote,+Corruption,+Christopher+Story&btnG=Search =====================================
The
above text has been copied from the following
Indymedia (Ireland)
location:
http://www.indymedia.ie/article/79125?comment_limit=0&condense_comments=false#comment173166 today.
