Do any of our lawyers have what it takes though to now use this
"
mighty stick" effectively, and responsibly, I
wonder?
============ ========= ========
"Nefarious
Methods"by W.
Finnerty. Wed Sep 05, 2007
14:54 Titled as follows:
"Sovereignty
Stripping" Versus "Judges' Declaration" - an e-mail was sent yesterday to a
selection of senior politicians and lawyers.
Basically, it was an
attempt to show how the present
Tara "situation" may well be an example
(and a symptom) of what Nobel Prize winner and former World Bank Vice President
Joseph Stiglitz has described as the
"nefarious (i.e. unlawful,
wicked, and evil)
methods of inducing countries to fall under their debt
before stripping them of sovereignty". (For the article containing this
quote from Joseph Stiglitz, please go to
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/october2006/301006globalcrash.htm
.)
Allowing for the possible presence of these "nefarious methods",
it now seems extremely important (to me at least) that, as part of the
new
court challenge, the constitutionality of
National Monuments (Amendment)
Act 2004 is fully checked out and decided upon by our judiciary: one way or
the other.
Either our National Monuments (Amendment) Act 2004
is constitutional, or it's not? - as can ultimately be determined by our
Supreme Court if necessary.
Allowing for the major doubts
expressed by some of our most senior lawyers regarding the constitutionality of
our National Monuments (Amendment) Act 2004, it appears to me we all badly need
to know the answer to this question as soon as possible, and before this
particular piece of
highly dubious legislation is used to damage and/or
to destroy any more of our most important heritage sites.
A copy of
the e-mail sent yesterday to the
large group of senior lawyers and
politicians in question can be viewed at
http://www.europeancourtofhumanrightswilliamfinnerty.com/ChiefJusticeMurray/4September2007/Email.htm
.
While I, like many others I imagine, believe the breaking of
European Union law is an extremely serious issue, it nevertheless seems to me to
be of secondary importance to the possibility that unconstitutional law
belonging to the
Republic of Ireland, i.e. our "National Monuments
(Amendment) Act 2004", is possibly being used by
global banking
organisations for nefarious purposes; and, with the assistance perhaps (?)
of some members of
our own judiciary: keeping in mind the so far
unexplained EUROS 600,000 High Court debacle of 2006, which appears to
have failed completely in regard to its most important task - that of deciding
whether this particular piece of legislation is constitutional or
not.
Also, and among other things, it seems to me that the people
of the Republic of Ireland now badly need to learn how to sort out their own
internal legal problems: instead of hoping the
European Union will do it
all for us, and waiting around for them to act - which they may, or may not,
do?
Fortunately, as Tara is such an important
world-class
heritage site, and of such great importance to so many people around the
world, it now conveniently provides a potentially very powerful "stick" to
severely challenge any nefarious methods which are possibly being used against
it.
Do any of our lawyers have what it takes though to now use this
"
mighty stick" effectively, and responsibly, I
wonder?
Related Link: http://www.constitutionofireland.com/
.
============ ========= ========
The above text has
been copied from the following
Indymedia (Ireland) location
http://www.indymedia.ie/article/83999#comment206398
.
