Gerry,
 
Further to our telephone conversation of this morning, I would like to try and clarify things as best I can regarding the contents of the letter I now plan to send to John Glynn tomorrow. (John Glynn is a barrister and the principal lawyer at Hogan & Co.)
 
As I have already related to you, the main issue now for me is that Greg Nolan (lawyer at Hogan & Co.) appears to me to be completely ignoring the entire contents of the e-mail I sent to you on March 14th 2007: which I copied to him. Though this seems completely outrageous to me, and almost beyond belief in fact, there is nothing of significance I can do about it that I can think of: other than - perhaps - to formally point out the difficulty to John Glynn in writing. (A copy of my March 14th 2007 e-mail to you can be viewed at http://www.europeancourtofhumanrightswilliamfinnerty.com/GerardMadden14March2007/Email.htm .)
 
My hope is that John Glynn may take a different view of things once he is thus informed; and, as a consequence, that he will then go on to provide me with the legal help I desperately now need. If he refuses, then it is my intention to completely sever my links with Hogan & Co., and to formally ask them, in writing, for all legal papers (which they hold) connected with my home in New Inn to be returned to me. Should things develop to that stage, I understand Gerald (my brother) would be willing to collect the papers in question, by hand, from their office on my behalf.
 
With further reference to my e-mail to you dated March 14th 2007, it is my understanding that you followed up on the possibility of arranging the meeting I mentioned in paragraph 7. However, and although I further understand that you did talk on the telephone with Greg Nolan last Wednesday (March 28th 2007), and then with myself during our meeting of last Thursday (March 29th 2007), and again on the telephone this morning, the overall conclusion you now hold is that there would not be any point in you trying to pursue, any further, the kind of meeting I proposed between yourself and Greg Nolan (and hopefully with Gerald & Margie present as well - keeping in mind the matter of the ongoing, and for me worrying, business of the 1,000 Euros per month loans they have been been paying into my bank account for well over a year now).
 
Basically, and I as I tried to explain to you at our meeting of last Thursday (March 29th 2007), and again in this morning's telephone conversation, it appears to me that Greg Nolan (as with ALL of the several other lawyers I have tried to get help from so far) wishes to treat the extant warrant for my arrest as though it was legally valid. This appears to me to be the result of a mindset among lawyers which has them believing, or pretending to believe at least, that it is okay for public officials to put themselves above the law, and others beneath it: as and when they please more or less.  From my viewpoint, this mindset is entirely the product of rampant corruption within the legal profession, as is the extant warrant for my arrest. 
 
Allowing for this "lawyers' mindset", which appears to have spilled over and found extremely troublesome acceptance in many other areas of life as well, I still believe the best way for me to try and get JUSTICE (and not yet more injustice please note), is through the Article 13 ("Right to an effective remedy") route of the "European Convention on Human Rights Act 2003 (Republic of Ireland).  The BIG advantage for me with that approach is that I would not (as far as I know), at ANY point, have to act as though I believed the extant warrant for my arrest was legally valid. 
 
For me to go to court PRETENDING that I believed the warrant for my arrest was legally valid, and allowing for the fact that I have been diagnosed as suffering from "Complex-Post Traumatic Stress Disorder" by Dr Michael McCavert GP, would be the MOST STUPID THING THAT I COULD POSSIBLY DO: having due regard for the fact that "explosive anger" is one of the main C-PTSD symptoms I continue to suffer from - as you have pointed out to Minister for Justice McDowell TD in your letter to him dated November 7th 2005.  (An electronic copy of your letter of November 7th 2005 can be viewed at http://www.europeancourtofhumanrightswilliamfinnerty.com/Constitution/GerardMadden7November2005/Letter.htm .)
 
What do you suppose would happen to me if, for example, as a direct result of the Complex-Post Traumatic Stress Disorder I continue to suffer from, I ended up verbally attacking the judge in court (in an uncontrollable manner)? - and in circumstances whereby there is almost no limit possibly, in terms of very hefty fines and periods of imprisonment, to what judges in the Republic of Ireland can do to people who they deem to have acted in "contempt of court".  ???  ???   ???
 
As I mentioned towards the end of this morning's telephone conversation, if I have not heard anything from you by the end of today, I will send the above mentioned letter to John Glynn (at Hogan & Co, Ballinasloe, County Galway) tomorrow. 
 
Best wishes,

William.

Related internet web site: http://www.europeancourtofhumanrightswilliamfinnerty.com/index.htm